Experiment Time: Timered Grinders

7 Sep

I recently acquired a Viponel S15 Darkroom timer to attach to my grinder as a non-permanant timer mod.  My reasoning for this may be explained at a different point.

There has been a serious take up on the timer modded grinders both in competition use and in shops looking for consistency alongside freshness.

I became curious as to how dependable the timer mod is in terms of ground coffee ending up in the portafilter.  In order to test I measured the grind over 50 timed grinds of 2.5secs each weighed to an accuracy of 1/100th of a gram.  I used a single origin coffee of a relatively dark roast that I use for seasoning and such with an espresso grind setting and the coffee loaded into the hopper in one large portion. The use of a single origin is to negate any possibility of having a variance in the load upon the motor from different density varietals.[1]

The grinder used is a Wega 2.6k which is a rebranded Compak K6.[2]

The results were an average grind of 6.83g of coffee reaching the portafilter.  Exactly half (25) of the doses were within 1/4 gram of the average and 37 of the doses (74%) within 1/2 gram of the average.

An interesting pattern of weight distribution also occurs.  Almost uniformly a portion is above average and then below with few outliers from the pattern.

I would suspect that the main variable that is affecting the result is clumping.  I noticed during the experiment that at times there were more grounds being held at the chute rather than going into the dosing chamber.

I suspect that using a courser ground there would be a lot more consistency within the dosing and perhaps using a lighter roast of coffee may have a different result being that there would be less surface oils to adhere the coffee particles.

In the end a relatively interesting set of results.  I would be interested to conduct further experiments to see what differences may be found within different fineness settings, roasts and varietals.  Though a full range of doses extended from 5.90 grammes to 8.71 (an extreme outlier,the next largest dose being 8.10) I would suspect the consistency is much higher that of a full, calibrated dosing chamber due to weight of the coffee above it etc.  in addition to the fact that coffee in a dosing chamber is sitting going stale. In my opinion timer-dosed coffee, even with a margin of inconsistency is undoubtedly preferable in terms of the resulting cup.

If anyone has any insight into the results or would like to see my (slightly messy) spreadsheet for the verbose results then e-mail/twitter me and I’ll forward them on.

1. It should be noted that the roast looked slightly inconsistent so that may have affected the ground dose by adding load to the grinder, even if only momentarily.

2. Another point of note with the grinder is that the exit chute from the grinding chamber holds approximately 4-5g of coffee before it reaches the chamber, so there’s an amount of room for compression and clumping within the chute.  Also the dosing chamber in this grinder has a few points where coffee can remain.


3 Responses to “Experiment Time: Timered Grinders”

  1. Daniel M. 11 October, 2010 at 3:55 am #

    I wonder when and if we will see espresso grinders which incorporate scales as the means of switching the grinder off. Weighing has been trumpeted as the quintessential method for achieving consistency in both filter and espresso preparations and yet there remains an interim step between grinding the espresso and ascertaining the weight of the dose you pulled. Only a matter of time?

    Come to think of it, what about scales on espresso machine drip trays? Mr. Hoffman has taken to the scale for his shots. Somebody needs to get on this.

    • Alex Redgate 11 October, 2010 at 7:09 am #

      I would love to see scale integration in grinders but 2 things make me think if it is going to happen then it’ll be a while off.

      1. Scale technology is relatively slow, if you weigh anything on most commercial quality grinders any weight change can take a couple of seconds to register
      2. (And more limiting) There is a very small demand for it. Though I love the idea of both scale integrated grinders and espresso machines I just don’t see there being enough call for it to have manufacturers invest R&D in the technologies.

      What we might see though, in the same vein as we’ve seen with timered grinders is people taking on the aftermarket area. Draining scales may be a closer reality to us than replacement hoppers, but time will tell…

      • Daniel M. 11 October, 2010 at 6:49 pm #

        Good point regarding how slow a scale’s – even a high quality version – response time is. I hadn’t thought of that, although I could think of a few design scenarios that might make the integration of a scale into a grinder a bit more useable.

        Given the slow response time, I can also see why the gradual flow of a pouring shot/shots would lend itself more to being weighed at time of production than grinds would.

        I also agree that these types of features are perfect for the aftermarket vendors. I can’t see a major vendor putting much R&D into something like this without a well-defined market to place it into whereas a small operation could put it out there with less to lose.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: